Re: Fwd: 21.08.2004 [rael-science] [A NEW MESSAGE FROM THE ELOHIM] S

From: Rita Westley

Date: 2008-05-22 21:02:09

#ygrps-yiv-42338048 v0003a* { } #ygrps-yiv-42338048 v0003a* { } Spellcheck, oops  lets just say  I was not asked to give 1/4 of my income.  Or if I was I did not do so but still was a member of the UK Team.   ——-Original Message——-   From: Andrew Date: 5/22/2008 8:07:07 PM To: Cognoscence@yahoogro… Subject: [Cognoscence] Re: Fwd: 21.08.2004 [rael-science] [A NEW MESSAGE FROM THE ELOHIM] Super colliders should not be used   The real group is very unusual. I understand that, if you wish to join, you are asked to pledge 1/4 of your income (or some other fraction) to help fund the group or something – although the website doesn’t seem to say that any more though.VERY slick website though…Hmmmm — In Cognoscence@ yahoogroups. com, post2wm@… wrote:>> > A message received by Rael on 21.08.2004 related to the LHC. Still > the the latest of the rare messages from the Elohim. Colour added for emphasis.> > > >~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~> >”Ethics” is simply a last-gasp attempt by deist conservatives and> >orthodox dogmatics to keep humanity in ignorance and obscurantism,> >through the well tried fermentation of fear, the fear of science and> >new technologies.> >> >There is nothing glorious about what our ancestors call history,> >it is simply a succession of mistakes, intolerances and violations.> >> >On the contrary, let us embrace Science and the new technologies> >unfettered, for it is these which will liberate mankind from the> >myth of god, and free us from our age old fears, from disease,> >death and the sweat of labour.> >> > Rael> >~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~> >———– ——— ——— ——— ——— ——— –> >> >Tell your friends who love scientific news that they can> >subscribe to this list !!> >> >They can do it by sending a blank email to:> > subscribe@.. .> >> >It’s free !> >> >> >> >> >~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~> >The Raelian Movement> >for those who are not afraid of the future : > >http://www.rael. org> >~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~> >> >A NEW MESSAGE FROM THE ELOHIM RECEIVED AUGUST 20 59 AH :> > WARNING : SUPER COLLIDERS SHOULD NOT BE USED BY HUMANITY !> >Super colliders should not be used as they cause damage and galactic> >cataclysms in infinitely small universes – destroying many lives. The> >Elohim, as guardians of peace, non violence and harmony at all levels> >of infinity, ask human beings to not use any technology that creates> >huge cataclysms in infinitely small universes. It is not good as it> >annihilates huge numbers of civilisations and can also affect the> >balance of our own universe. Science is good and should be unlimited as> >long as it fuses elements, but never used when it breaks or cracks> >infinitely small particles.> >> >~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~> >> >> >> >Source: BBC News> >http://news. bbc.co.uk/2/hi/ science/nature/ 3583658.stm> >> >Particle collider edges forward> >A key decision on the International Linear Collider, one of the grand> >scientific projects of the 21st Century, has been taken in China.> >> >Physicists told a Beijing conference that the multi-billion- dollar> >project should use superconducting technology to create its particle> >collisions.> >> >These would be high-energy impacts inside a 30km-long laboratory.> >> >The experiments should give scientists a deeper understanding of the> >materials used to construct the Universe.> >> >At the moment, the so-called Standard Model of particles and their> >interactions provides only a partial picture of the nature of the> >normal matter we see around us.> >> >Researchers know, however, the cosmos is dominated by other material> >which is invisible to current detection technologies.> >> >New light> >> >Europe is currently building a Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at its Cern> >laboratory in Geneva, Switzerland, and this is expected to open up a> >new research frontier when it becomes operational in 2007.> >> >But scientists believe they will need the ILC to carry forward their> >studies and expand any discoveries made at the LHC.> >> >The ILC is a giant undertaking that could cost upwards of $5bn. It> >would accelerate electrons and positrons (the antimatter version of the> >electron) down two 15-km-long pipes and smash them together at a> >central point.> >> >In the debris, scientists would hope to see new particles flash into> >and out of view.> >> >For example, the collider could reveal details about the long sought> >Higgs boson, the particle said to explain why all others have mass.> >> >It may also shed light on the neutralino, a particle hypothesised to> >interact only weakly with everything around it but which may account> >for much of the “dark matter” that pervades the Universe.> >> >Now, after 10 years of investigation and development by several teams,> >the group charged with pushing the ILC forward has set a major> >technical parameter for the project.> >> >More efficient> >> >Making its announcement at the International Conference on High Energy> >Physics, the International Committee for Future Accelerators said the> >collider should employ niobium superconducting technology in the system> >it uses to accelerate particles.> >> >This technology, developed by a collaboration centred on the DESY lab> >in Germany, would operate at -271C, just above absolute zero.> >> >It has been chosen in preference to a rival “warm” copper technology> >developed in the US and Japan.> >> >Professor George Kalmus, from the UK’s Rutherford Appleton Laboratory,> >is a member of the International Technology Recommendation Panel, which> >had suggested the ILC adopt the “cold” approach.> >> >”The transfer of the energy from the power source into the electron> >beam is very highly efficient in the cold technology.> >> >”In the warm technology, there is a considerable electrical loss and> >you have to take that out. So, one of the consequences is that you use> >a lot more power for the warm than for the cold.”> >> >No decision has been made yet about where to site the ILC but the US,> >Japan and Germany would appear to be the leading candidates. However,> >wherever it is constructed, it will be a challenge.> >> >The tunnels down which the particles race will be underground and that> >will be very expensive.> >> >Further forward> >> >As with other projects on this scale, such as the space station and the> >international fusion reactor known as Iter, the ILC can only be built> >by a global consortium.> >> >And, as with those projects, getting a consensus to move forward can> >sometimes be difficult.> >> >Michael Witherell, director of US Fermi National Accelerator> >Laboratory, where scientists have worked on both warm and cold> >technologies, said: “With the technology decision behind us, the> >particle physics community can now begin work on a global design for a> >linear collider.> >> >”At the same time, science funding agencies from nations in Europe and> >Asia, along with the US and others, must reach agreement on the> >mechanisms for funding and operating a truly global accelerator> >somewhere in the world.> >> >”There are many steps ahead of us before an international linear> >collider becomes a reality, but today’s announcement of the technology> >choice provides an important focus.”>